Submission Health innovation Smarter investment System reform and governance Commercialisation Health services Industry Prevention

Themes and Priorities for the CRC Programme: Response to the Consultation

Research Australia 1 February 2017 2017 · Submission

In brief

Research Australia recommended the Government to bring back ‘public good’ Cooperative Research Centres, which no longer need an industry lead. Much health innovation, such as new hospital practices or online mental health programs, improves care without being sold commercially.

Abstract

This response to the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science consultation on themes and priorities for the Cooperative Research Centres (CRC) Programme records Research Australia’s survey input. It welcomes the inclusion of three health themes (clinical health care, mental health, and remote and Indigenous health) among the eight proposed, declines to rank them, and maintains that the Programme should support health advances beyond these three. Its main argument is for reinstating Public Good CRCs, excluded since the December 2015 guidelines required lead participants to be industry entities. Citing healthcare expenditure of about $161 billion a year, $108.2 billion of it by governments, it maintains that the health market’s structure means many valuable innovations, such as e-mental health programs and hospital protocols, resist commercialisation.