Submission Health innovation Smarter investment Clinical trials Commercialisation Economic diversification Industry

Treasury Laws Amendment (Research and Development Incentive) Bill 2018: Response to the Consultation

Research Australia 1 July 2018 2018 · Submission

In brief

Research Australia welcomes the plan to exempt clinical trials from the cap on the R&D Tax Incentive but asks for a broader definition of clinical trial. It opposes cutting the incentive before its effects have been evaluated, warning that small research companies that make losses would lose support.

Abstract

This submission to Treasury responds to the consultation on the Treasury Laws Amendment (Research and Development Incentive) Bill 2018, informed by the Issues Paper and a consultation meeting in Melbourne on 17 July 2018. Research Australia supports the proposed exemption of clinical trial expenditure from the $4 million cap on the refundable R&D Tax Incentive, noting the cross-portfolio effort governments have made to attract clinical trials to Australia. It is concerned, however, that adopting the Therapeutic Goods Administration definition of a clinical trial may exclude medical devices and newer interventions, and proposes a broader definition such as that used by the World Health Organization. Although the rate cuts are government policy rather than part of the consultation, it maintains that the R&D Tax Incentive should not be reduced until its economic impact since 2011 has been evaluated, which may take several years, particularly given an unexplained recent fall in private sector R&D. It rejects the argument that lower company tax rates offset the cut for small companies, since many receiving the refundable offset are loss-making and pay little or no income tax. It notes that the Government has not adopted Innovation and Science Australia’s proposed funding floor of 0.63% of gross domestic product, and recommends that any rate reduction apply from the next financial year rather than the current one.